Trapping Legislation


Several bills were filed this session that would expand the use of inhumane and indiscriminate body gripping traps, such as legholds, Conibears, and snares. These traps can catch any animal, wild or domestic, who walks or swims into them, causing intense suffering and death. The MSPCA opposes legislation that would expand trapping in Massachusetts.

The bills filed this session take a variety of approaches, but the result would effectively allow a return to the days of recreational trapping with inhumane and indiscriminate devices, practices that 64% of Massachusetts voters rejected when they voted in favor of Wildlife Protection Act ballot initiative.

Take Action to Protect Wildlife in Massachusetts

Background of the current trapping law:

In 1996, 64% percent of the voters in Massachusetts declared their opposition to the use of body-gripping traps for capturing fur-bearing mammals by voting in favor of the Wildlife Protection Act. In 2000, the legislature made revisions to the law, with negotiations centering around allowing reasonable exceptions to the prohibitions on trapping in order to facilitate solutions to damage caused by beavers and muskrats, while still retaining the intent of the ballot initiative. Specifically, these changes moved some control from the state to the local level in order to make the permitting process in cases of threats to health and safety more expedient.

Key reasons that changes to the current law are unnecessary:

The MSPCA opposes any change to the current law that would reduce the use of non-lethal solutions as a means to resolve conflicts with animals. Such changes are unnecessary—they would not result in less beaver-related flooding or a reduced beaver population—and would be contrary to the intent of the ballot question.


Call Now Button
Our $50,000 Challenge Match is happening NOW: Donate before August 14th to have your donation doubled!
<- global tag ->