DONATE NOW

S. 175, H. 800: An Act banning the retail sale of cats and dogs in pet shops

S. 175, H. 800: An Act banning the retail sale of cats and dogs in pet shops
Sponsors: Senator Patrick O’Connor and Representative Natalie Higgins
Status: Referred to the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure, hearing held July 22, 2019

Why are these bills needed?

Pet shops typically acquire their dogs and cats from inhumane commercial breeding facilities, often called “puppy mills” or “kitten mills.” Pet stores are a preferred sales outlet for puppy mills because they allow the cruelty at the mills to remain hidden from consumers. These bills prohibit the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits from pet shops unless the animals come from shelters or rescue organizations.

This legislation does not prevent consumers from acquiring a dog, cat, or rabbit from a responsible breeder or a shelter or rescue organization. Further, it does not prohibit a pet shop from partnering with a shelter or rescues to provide animals in their store. California and Maryland recently joined more than 310 municipalities nationwide—including Boston, Cambridge, and Stoneham—in passing laws that prohibit the sale of commercially-raised dogs and cats in pet stores.

Where do pet shops get their animals?

While pet stores may claim that they obtain animals from small-scale, humane breeders, the reality is that pet stores cannot obtain dogs from responsible breeders because responsible breeders simply do not sell puppies to pet stores—responsible breeders want to meet their puppy buyers in person. Furthermore, ninety-six percent of the Codes of Ethics of the National Breed Clubs, which represent all 178 dog breeds recognized by the Animal Kennel Club, prohibit or discourage their members from selling their dogs to pet stores. Thus pet shops animals are almost always obtained their animals from commercial breeding facilities.

Although commercial dog breeding facilities are inspected by the USDA under Animal Welfare Act (AWA) regulations, the standards of care are very low. USDA standards allow commercial breeders to keep dogs in cramped, stacked, wire cages for their entire lives. The USDA does not require that dogs be regularly let outside of their cages for exercise, nor does it mandate socialization. Dogs can be kept in extreme temperatures for prolonged periods of time. Females are bred as early and often as possible and personnel without veterinary training often perform surgical births. Breeders are not required to vaccinate dogs from many highly infectious deadly diseases or to provide regular veterinary care. Puppies are taken from their mothers at very young ages, exposing them to a range of behavioral issues, and because puppy mill dogs are often overbred or inbred, they frequently suffer from health and genetic disorders. When puppy mill mother dogs are no longer able to reproduce, breeders often abandon or inhumanely euthanize them. Thus, even if a commercial breeder complies with all USDA requirements—which in fact is rarely the case—a breeder can keep animals in extremely inhumane conditions.

How does this bill impact consumers?

Animal organizations regularly receive complaints from Massachusetts consumers who have spent thousands of dollars in veterinary bills caring for their sick pet store puppies. Massachusetts families deserve better than risking unknowingly supporting the puppy mill industry and buying sick or behaviorally challenged puppies.

An examination of federal documents and Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources records demonstrated that many Massachusetts pet stores source puppies from some of the largest puppy mill brokers in the country. Brokers are middlemen dealers who pick up young puppies from mills, cage them on semi-trucks with numerous other puppies, many of whom are sick, and transport them across the country to be sold in pet stores. One broker in particular, Choice Puppies (formerly the Hunte Corporation) transports 30,000 puppies yearly and was cited by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources for burying more than 1,000 pounds of dead puppies per year, creating an environmental hazard. By buying from brokers instead of directly from breeders, pet shops make it very difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to find out where the animals come from. This lack of transparency, particularly when so many pet store animals are sick or behaviorally challenged, is a significant consumer protection issue.

Too many families are unable to afford the sudden and unexpected veterinary bills that often accompany animals sourced from mills, and have to make the choice to relinquish their pet animal to a shelter or rescue organization. A study in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association concluded that pet shop dogs are more likely to exhibit aggression, inappropriate elimination, biting, and other behavioral problems, all of which are common factors leading to the surrender of a dog.

Most Massachusetts families already adopt from shelters and rescues or buy from the network of responsible breeders, so restricting puppy sales in pet stores will still allow consumers to obtain the dog of their choice. While some might seek out puppies from other puppy mill sales outlets, such as the internet, there is no evidence that regulating pet stores drives more people to these sources.

What about pet shops who claim they do everything right?

Pet stores selling commercially-raised puppies adhere to an outdated and socially unacceptable business model, and are outliers in their own industry. Of the top twenty-five pet store chains in the nation, only one sells puppies. The others are thriving by selling products and offering quality services, such as grooming, training and boarding. They also partner with shelters and rescues to hold adoption events at their stores, saving animals’ lives and driving more consumers into their stores to buy all the supplies a new canine family member needs.

Many stores that used to sell puppy mill puppies are thriving on the humane model. For instance, the owner of Pet Rush in California changed his business model after learning the truth about where his puppies came from. He started offering boarding and daycare services, and was so successful that he expanded to a larger location. And, Pets Plus Natural, with 8 stores throughout New Jersey and Pennsylvania, converted to the humane model after the owners learned about pet overpopulation. They decided to become part of the solution to pet overpopulation, rather than continuing to add to the problem. As of today, Pets Plus Natural stores have adopted out over 8,000 rescue animals and business is thriving. The owners credit their success to having a much better reputation in the community.

Co-Sponsors:

State Senators:

Patrick M. O’Connor
Jason M. Lewis
James T. Welch
Marc R. Pacheco
Bruce E. Tarr
Ryan C. Fattman
Sal N. DiDomenico
Michael O. Moore
John F. Keenan
Mark C. Montigny
Paul R. Feeney
William N. Brownsberger
Julian Cyr
Walter F. Timilty

State Representatives:

Natalie M. Higgins
Jack Patrick Lewis
Maria Duaime Robinson
Peter Capano
Mary S. Keefe
Ann-Margaret Ferrante
David Paul Linsky
Ruth B. Balser
Tram T. Nguyen
Tommy Vitolo
Lindsay N. Sabadosa
Elizabeth A. Malia
Louis L. Kafka
Daniel J. Ryan
Adrian C. Madaro
David M. Rogers
David Allen Robertson
Carole A. Fiola
Joan Meschino
Michelle M. DuBois
Josh S. Cutler
Patrick Joseph Kearney
Denise Provost
Tricia Farley-Bouvier
Joseph D. McKenna
James M. Murphy
John Barrett, III
Richard M. Haggerty
Mike Connolly
Jonathan Hecht
Denise C. Garlick
Michael S. Day
John C. Velis
Sean Garballey
James Arciero
Colleen M. Garry
Carmine Lawrence Gentile
Marjorie C. Decker
Daniel R. Cullinane
Edward F. Coppinger
Bradford Hill
Paul Brodeur
Brian M. Ashe
Steven Ultrino
Bruce J. Ayers
Paul F. Tucker
David Biele
William C. Galvin
Lenny Mirra
James K. Hawkins
Brian W. Murray
Linda Dean Campbell
Daniel J. Hunt

 

 

 

Call Now Button <- Simpli.fi global tag ->